1.1. Local Indigenous food systems

WECLIFS is supported by Ouranos, Gouvernement du Québec, and regional organizations of Eeyou Istchee and Nunavik

1.1. Introduction

Local Indigenous food systems include the harvest of locally available, non-domesticated wildlife (i.e., plants and animals) by Indigenous Peoples for their own consumption and for food sharing with family and community. Also referred to as traditional food, country food, or wild food, the rights of Indigenous Peoples to hunt for food was enshrined in the first historical treaties and is a key consideration in modern comprehensive land claims. Local food represents an important source of energy, protein, and micronutrients to Indigenous communities across northern North America and consumption of local food has been associated with lower rates of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, and higher rates of food security. Local Indigenous food systems also embody the knowledge, relationships, and reciprocities that connect people to nature and create the possibility of “being alive well” (Adelson 2000). Accordingly, local food systems are inextricably linked with identity and the cultural and spiritual well-being of Indigenous peoples, representing both a cultural strength and a source of identity. Language and food are closely related components of Indigenous cultures and the richness of Indigenous languages, particular with respect to words describing land and water, seasons and weather, plants and animals, as well as harvest and food, across a multitude of Indigenous dialects, languages, and language families speaks to the collective richness and diversity of local food and culture. Indigenous Peoples continue to depend on the harvest and consumption of wild plants and animals as critical sources of nutrition, tradition, identity, culture, and relationship to land, which individually and collectively relate to Indigenous conceptions of health. Accordingly, we suggest the following definition: Local Indigenous food systems are the culture and wellness of harvesting, consuming, and conserving local biodiversity.

Store-bought food is also a key contributor to nutrition and food security in northern and Arctic communities, and the high cost of store-bought food, combined with low incomes and limited access to wage economies, is a widely identified barrier to food security in northern regions. High rates of food insecurity across northern Canada have been attributed to a variety of factors including limited access, availability, and use of healthy country food or healthy store-bought food, especially in Nunavut and Nunavik, where food insecurity affects 50% to 80% of households, which is 10 times higher than the Canadian average. The extent to which economy, environment, and culture co-determine food security is reflected in how the Nunavut Food Security Coalition (2014, page 2) describes the four components of food security: “availability (enough wildlife on the land or groceries in the store), accessibility (adequate money for hunting equipment or store-bought food, and the ability to obtain it), quality (healthy food that is culturally valued), and use (knowledge about how to obtain, store, prepare, and consume food).”

Economic development, food security, and climate change adaptation have emerged as key pillars of northern policy and investment. However, economic investment often focuses on job creation through natural resource exploration and extraction, food security investment in subsidy programs intended to reduce the cost of store-bought food, and climate adaptation in relation to transportation, infrastructure preparedness, and technology-assisted agri-food production. While these are important initiatives and investments that are helping to transform northern economies and communities, they can be argued to be peripheral and transient to the primary economy that has long defined and continues to define northern regions. In many, if not most, communities and households, on most, if not all, days of the year, local food is the food that feeds people, the labour that employs people, the economy that supports people, and the culture that defines people.

Local food consumption is being negatively impacted by the high costs of harvesting equipment, changing food preferences, and climate changes that are impacting wildlife and restricting access to harvesting areas. Climate change has impacted and will continue to impact local foods, local food systems, and local food security in many, profound ways, particularly at high latitudes, where both observed and projected warming is most pronounced. Community concerns about the potential negative impacts of climate change frequently focus on declining or disappearing wildlife populations, changes in the health and behaviour of animals, and difficulties and dangers associated with travelling on land, water, and ice (Gérin-Lajoie et al. 2015). Research on environmental change and local food security needs to identify the likely climate change impacts on key food species as well as the adaptation strategies that enable the maintenance of local food security in changing environments.

Further, in northern regions, job creation and economic development often focus on the exploitation of natural resources that may negatively impact land, water, and wildlife populations. Not surprisingly, local opposition to or approval for transportation and resource development initiatives most often depends on their impacts on wildlife populations, the environment, and the integrity of the local food system. As articulated by the Nunavut Food Security Coalition (2014, page 7), “preserving the ecological integrity of Nunavut food resources is a key component of a sustainable food system in Nunavut, and is therefore of concern to food security.” How best to support this mixed economy – in a manner that maintains the integrity of the local food system - is a complex and formidable challenge. Commodification of culture and tradition describes part of the challenge, though food has forever been a commodity exchanged through sharing networks defining traditional economies. Community-suggested improvements for the Nutrition North subsidy program emphasized the need to expand the program to address economic barriers to country food access. Community-led research on climate change adaptation has shifted adaptation focus towards helping hunters safely access harvest sites, community freezers for the safe storage of country food, and elder-to-youth knowledge transmission related to the land, local food harvest and its preparation.

Contemporary local food systems across northern Canada and in Northern Quebec are defined by a mixed economy shaped by four primary considerations: local food, money, time, and know-how. Local food is a highly valued and prioritized common good. Money is required for the fuel and the equipment required to access, harvest, prepare, and share local food. Time is required for travel and harvest activities, with the amount of time required for safe travel and successful harvest often unpredictable due to the uncertainties of wildlife, weather, and equipment. Know-how - spanning everything from where and how to travel safely on land, water, and ice, how to use, maintain, and repair equipment, when and how to successfully harvest wildlife, how to butcher, share, prepare, and consume what has been harvested, and how to ensure conservation, stewardship and respectful relationship with land and wildlife - is an essential supporting condition that must be learned from experienced harvesters, then repeatedly practiced prior to becoming skilled, experienced, and proficient. Living in settled communities offers better access to wage economies, government services, and social networks, but increases the travel distances required to harvest local food, which requires more money, more equipment, more time, and more uncertainty. The time requirements, flexibility, and seasonal windows-of-opportunity involved in harvesting wildlife can be incompatible with full-time and permanent wage employment. Trade-offs among money, time, and know-how can result in those that have the money required to harvest local food not having the time, those that have the time not having the money, and many that have the money and the time lacking the knowledge, experience, or opportunity. Monetized harvester support programs (e.g., hunter income support) and monetized local food markets exist in varied forms across northern Quebec, but their immediate-term effectiveness and longer-term, broader-scale implications are poorly understood.

Gender also plays an important role in local indigenous food systems. Much local food and climate change research has focused on traditionally male-dominated land-based activities such as hunting, fishing, and trapping. However, Indigenous women also contribute a central, foundational role in local food systems, particularly in relation to food preparation, food choice, nutrition, and health. In many First Nations and Inuit households, women are the main income earners; their participation in the wage economy provides financial resources that support household harvesting activities but also reduces the time women have available to themselves engage in local food activities. Women also tend to be disproportionately affected by food insecurity, hunger, and poverty globally, across the circumpolar north, and in northern Quebec. Research also indicates women tend to prioritize the eating of healthy local food in their household and to have specific food security concerns related to feeding their children.

​The experience of profound ecological and cultural change is not something new to northern communities, and the continuity of local food consumption, spanning historical and recent change, is a testament to the innovativeness and adaptability of Indigenous Peoples and their local food systems. Describing local food systems as traditional emphasizes their antiquity, their multi-generational depth, and their connection to the cultural history of communities. On the other hand, food, culture, and environment are constantly changing, independently and in relation to each other, as a result of environmental change, but also due to diverse forms of social and societal change.

The WECLIFS project seeks to document and anticipate the impacts of climate change on traditional food security in northern Québec, including the Cree communities of Eeyou Istchee and the Inuit communities of Nunavik, through the bringing together of existing knowledge and the co-creation of new knowledge. This research is intended to support the adaptive capacity of northern communities in relation to the integrity of their local food systems and the contributions of local food to well-being, culture, and relationship to land. Specifically, we seek to co-identify, with local knowledge holders and regional organizations, adaptation and mitigation strategies that can minimize the negative impacts of climate change on local food systems, while strengthening the social-ecological resilience of Eeyou Istchee and Nunavik.

The above description of local Indigenous food systems has been informed, in part, by the following sources:

Adelson, N. 1998. Health beliefs and the politics of Cree well-being. Health 2:5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F136345939800200101.Adelson, N. 2000. ‘Being alive well’: health and the politics of Cree well-being. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada. Borré, K. 1991. Seal blood, Inuit blood, and diet: A biocultural model of physiology and cultural identity. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 5(1):48 – 62. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1991.5.1.02a00080Blanchet, C. & Rochette, L. (2008). Nutrition and Food Consumption among the Inuit of Nunavik. Nunavik Inuit Health Survey 2004, Qanuippitaa? How are we? Quebec: Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ) & Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services (NRBHSS). https://www.inspq.qc.ca/pdf/publications/762_ESI_Nutrition_Report_MA.pdfBloom, J. D. and C. C. Hinrichs. 2011. Moving local food through conventional food system infrastructure: Value chain framework comparisons and insights. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 26:13-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170510000384.Borrows, J. and Coyle, M. editors. 2017. The right relationship: Reimagining the implementation of historical treaties. University of Toronto Press.Caine, K.J., and Krogman, N. 2010. Powerful or just plain power-full? A power analysis of impact and benefit agreements in Canada’s North. Organization & Environment 23:76 – 98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026609358969.Champalle, C., Ford, J.D. and Sherman, M., 2015. Prioritizing climate change adaptations in Canadian Arctic communities. Sustainability, 7(7), pp.9268-9292. Chan, H.M., Fediuk, K., Hamilton, S., Rostas, L., Caughey, A., Kuhnlein, H., Egeland, G. and Loring, E., 2006. Food security in Nunavut, Canada: barriers and recommendations. International journal of circumpolar health, 65(5), pp.416-431. https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v65i5.18132Coates, K.S. 2015. The Road to Economic Stability for Aboriginal People. Macdonald-Laurier Institute Commentary, May. Available at http://www.macdonaldlaurier.ca/files/pdf/MLICommentaryCoates05-15-WebReadyV2.pdf.Collings, P., Wenzel, G. and Condon, R.G. 1998. Modern food sharing networks and community integration in the central Canadian Arctic. Arctic 51:301-314. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic1073.Collings, P., Marten, M.G., Pearce, T. and Young, A.G. 2016. Country food sharing networks, household structure, and implications for understanding food insecurity in Arctic Canada. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 55:30-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2015.1072812.Condon, R.G., Collings, P., and Wenzel, G. 1995. The best part of life: Subsistence hunting, ethnicity, and economic adaptation among young adult Inuit males. Arctic 48(1):31 –46. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic1222Council of Canadian Academies. 2014. Aboriginal Food Security in Northern Canada: An Assessment of the State of Knowledge, Ottawa, ON. The Expert Panel on the State of Knowledge of Food Security in Northern Canada, Council of Canadian Academies.Egeland, G.M., Johnson-Down, L., Cao, Z.R., Sheikh, N., and Weiler, H.A. 2011. Food insecurity and nutrition transition combine to affect nutrient intakes in Canadian Arctic communities. The Journal of Nutrition 141(9):1746 –1753. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.139006Ford, J.D., Willox, A.C., Chatwood, S., Furgal, C., Harper, S., Mauro, I. and Pearce, T., 2014. Adapting to the effects of climate change on Inuit health. American journal of public health, 104(S3), pp.e9-e17.Furgal, C. and Seguin, J., 2006. Climate change, health, and vulnerability in Canadian northern Aboriginal communities. Environmental health perspectives, 114(12), pp.1964-1970.Galloway, T. 2017. Canada’s northern food subsidy Nutrition North Canada: A comprehensive program evaluation. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 76:1279451 https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2017.1279451Healey, G. & Meadows, L. (2008). Tradition and culture: An important determinant of Inuit women’s health. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 4(1), 25-33 Available at: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/ijih/article/view/28959Hickey, G. M., M. Pouliot, C. Smith-Hall, S. Wunder, and M. R. Nielsen. 2016. Quantifying the economic contribution of wild food harvests to rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. Food Policy 62:122-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.06.001. Hjort, J., Karjalainen, O., Aalto, J., Westermann, S., Romanovsky, V.E., Nelson, F.E., Etzelmüller, B. and Luoto, M., 2018. Degrading permafrost puts Arctic infrastructure at risk by mid-century. Nature communications, 9(1), pp.1-9. Johns, T. and B. R. Sthapit. 2004. Biocultural diversity in the sustainability of developing-country food systems. Food and nutrition bulletin 25:143-155. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F156482650402500207.Kuhnlein, H.V. 1995. Benefits and risks of traditional food for Indigenous Peoples: focus on dietary intakes of Arctic men. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 73:765-771. https://doi.org/10.1139/y95-102.Kuhnlein, H.V., and Receveur, O. 1996. Dietary change and traditional food systems of Indigenous peoples. Annual Review of Nutrition 16: 417 –442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nu.16.070196.002221 Kuhnlein, H.V., Receveur, O., Soueida, R. and Egeland, G.M. 2004. Arctic indigenous peoples experience the nutrition transition with changing dietary patterns and obesity. The Journal of nutrition 134:1447-1453. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.6.1447.Kuhnlein H.V., S. Smitasiri, S. Yesudas, L. Bhattacharjee, L. Dan, S. Ahmed. 2006. Documenting traditional food systems of indigenous peoples: international case studies. Guidelines for procedures. Ste. Anne de Bellevue (Quebec): McGill University https://www.mcgill.ca/cine/files/cine/manual.pdfKuhnlein, H. V., and O. Receveur. 2007. Local cultural animal food contributes high levels of nutrients for Arctic Canadian indigenous adults and children. Journal of Nutrition 137:1110-1114. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/137.4.1110. Kuhnlein, H. V., B. Erasmus, and D. Spigelski. 2009. Indigenous peoples’ food systems: the many dimensions of culture, diversity and environment for nutrition and health. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/3/ i0370e/i0370e00.htm.Kuhnlein, H. V., B. Erasmus, D. Spigelski, and B. Burlingame, editors. 2013. Indigenous peoples’ food systems and well-being: interventions and policies for healthy communities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/3/i3144e/i3144e00.htm. Kukarenko, N. 2011. Climate change effects on human health in a gender perspective: some trends in Arctic research. Global Health Action 4:7913. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v4i0.7913.
Lamalice, A., Avard, E., Coxam, V., Herrmann, T., Desbiens, C., Wittrant, Y. and Blangy, S. 2016. Soutenir la sécurité alimentaire dans le Grand Nord: projets communautaires d’agriculture sous serre au Nunavik et au Nunavut. études/inuit/studies 40:147-169. https://doi.org/10.7202/1040149ar.
Lambden, J., Receveur, O., and Kuhnlein, H.V. 2007. Traditional food attributes must be included in studies of food security in the Canadian Arctic. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 66(4):308 –319. https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v66i4.18272Lawn, J., Brulé, D., Harvey, D. and Hill, F. 2002. An Update on Nutrition Surveys in Isolated Northern Communities: Revised 24-hour Diet Recall Data from the Food Mail Nutrition Surveys (1992 and 1993) and the Santé Québec Health Survey Among the Inuit of Nunavik, 1992, and Original Data from the 1997 Food Mail Nutrition Surveys. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.McIvor, O., A. Napoleon, and K. M. Dickie. 2013. Language and culture as protective factors for at-risk communities. International Journal of Indigenous Health 5:6-25. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijih51200912327.Murphy, N.J., D SCHRAER, C.Y.N.T.H.I.A., Thiele, M.C., Boyko, E.J., Bulkow, L.R., Doty, B.J. and Lanier, A.P., 1995. Dietary change and obesity associated with glucose intolerance in Alaska Natives. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 95(6), pp.676-682. Natcher, D.C. 2015. Social capital and the vulnerability of Aboriginal food systems in Canada. Human Organization 74:230-242. https://doi.org/10.17730/0018-7259-74.3.230.Nunavut Food Security Strategy and Action Plan 2014-16. Nunavut Food Security Coalition. https://foodsecurecanada.org/sites/foodsecurecanada.org/files/nunavutfoodsecuritystrategy_english.pdfOlsson, P., C. Folke, and F. Berkes. 2004. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management 34:75-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7.Proverbs, T. A., Lantz, T. C., Lord, S. I., Amos, A., and Ban, N. C. 2020. Social-ecological determinants of access to fish and well-being in four Gwich’in communities in Canada’s northwest territories. Human Ecology 48:155-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00131-x.Prowse, T.D., Furgal, C., Chouinard, R., Melling, H., Milburn, D. and Smith, S.L., 2009. Implications of climate change for economic development in northern Canada: Energy, resource, and transportation sectors. Ambio, pp.272-281. Quintal-Marineau, M., 2017. The new work regime in Nunavut: A gender perspective. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 61(3), pp.334-345. Ready, E. (2015). Ensuring country food access for a food secure future in Nunavik. Arctic and International Relations Series: Quebec policy on the Arctic: Challenges and perspectives, (1), 50-54.Receveur, O., Boulay, M., and Kuhnlein, H.V. 1997. Decreasing traditional food use affects diet quality for adult Dene/Métis in 16 communities of the Canadian Northwest Territories. The Journal of Nutrition 127(11):2179 –2186. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/127.11.2179 Rodon, T., and Lévesque, F. 2015. Understanding the social and economic impacts of mining development in Inuit communities: Experiences with past and present mines in Inuit Nunangat. Northern Review 41:13 – 39. https://doi.org/10.22584/nr41.2015.002.Rosol, R., Powell-Hellyer, S., and Chan, H.M. 2016. Impacts of decline harvest of country food on nutrient intake among Inuit in Arctic Canada: Impact of climate change and possible adaptation plan. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 75(1): 31127. https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v75.31127 Ruiz-Castell, M., Muckle, G., Dewailly, ÉSchulp, C.J., Thuiller, W. and Verburg, P.H. 2014. Wild food in Europe: A synthesis of knowledge and data of terrestrial wild food as an ecosystem service. Ecological economics 105:292-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.018.Sheehy, T., Roache, C. and Sharma, S. 2013. Eating habits of a population undergoing a rapid dietary transition: portion sizes of traditional and non-traditional foods and beverages consumed by Inuit adults in Nunavut, Canada. Nutrition journal 12:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-12-70.St-Germain, A.A.F., Galloway, T., and Tarasuk, V. 2019. Food insecurity in Nunavut following the introduction of Nutrition North Canada. CMAJ 191:E552 – E558. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181617Stevens, S., editors. 1997. Conservation through cultural survival: indigenous peoples and protected areas. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.Tremblay, R., M. Landry-Cuerrier, and M. M. Humphries. 2020. Culture and the social-ecology of local food use by Indigenous communities in northern North America. Ecology and Society 25:8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11542-250208.Usher, P.J. 2003. Environment, race and nation reconsidered: reflections on Aboriginal land claims in Canada. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien 47:365-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-3658.2003.00029.x.Wakegijig, J., Osborne, G., Statham, S., Doucette Issaluk, M. 2013. Collaborating toward improving food security in Nunavut. International Journal on Circumpolar Health. 72: 21201.Warltier, D.W., Landry-Cuerrier, M. and Humphries, M.M. 2021. Valuation of Country Food in Nunavut Based on Energy and Protein Replacement. Arctic 74:355-371. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic73390.Wenzel, G.W., 2000. Inuit subsistence and hunter support in Nunavut. Nunavut: Inuit Regain Control of Their Lands and Their Lives. IWGIA Document, 102, pp.180-193.Wenzel, George W. "Canadian Inuit subsistence and ecological instability—if the climate changes, must the Inuit?." Polar Research 28, no. 1 (2009): 89-99. Wenzel, GW. 2017. Canadian Inuit subsistence: Antinomies of the mixed economy. Hunter Gatherer Research 3:567–581. https://doi.org/10.3828/hgr.2017.29.